think about terms

[kossai]

do really believe in openness of terminology and frameworks , in terms of identity . find kind of hard to just simply sum up ideas on what make personhood plural and gender trans , but if have to , would probably say ...

plurality is umbrella for experiences with personhood and identity that do not solely fit bounds of one singular person with one singular mind . 

trans is umbrella for experiences with gender that do not solely fit bounds of what society expect gender to be , whether through internal aspects , external presentation , or both . 

both of these have frameworks for what " obvious standard " look like - whether that be classic understandings of MPD , or FTM/MTF - but think labels should be open to far wider reaches of experience as well , even if approaches , needs , and solutions different from others .

of course also not mandatory for everyone who might fit these experiences to adopt , especially if have other reasons and other labels that bring more comfort , but think fair enough for anyone who fit to find kinship and adopt if so choose . 

Comments

Yes ...

[ysabetwordsmith]

I've been mulling over descriptions for decades, and still occasionally find new ones I like, such as Swiss Army gender. I think genderqueer was among the earliest, and it does still fit. When I'm being more precise, I'll say that my sex/gender is a tesseract, because there are so many spectra, it doesn't fit into just 3 dimensions.